Ironically, I developed a cold while reading the biography of a spiritual healer. Torch-Bearer to Light the Way; the Life of Myrtle Fillmore is by Neal Vahle and includes an explanation of how Fillmore and her husband started the Unity movement from their home in Kansas City in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Along the way there is much connection with the contemporaneous Christian Science movement, but eventually the Fillmores distanced themselves from it. They felt it is more important to rely on your own inner knowing than to accept the dictates of outside authorities, especially in your spiritual life. And Christian Science founder Mary Baker Eddy appears to have been pretty dictatorial.
I try not to proofread when I'm reading for my own pleasure but this book was amazingly full of typos and mistakes. At one place I pondered over how a daughter could have been born before her mother until I finally realized that the author had inserted a birth date where he should have used a death date.
Adequate biography if you're interested in Unity.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
On Beauty by Zadie Smith
The ladies of my book club loved On Beauty and were amazed that the author who was born in 1975 was so able to get into the minds of characters in their 50s. She sets up two academic families, one in England and one in Massachusetts. The English family is black and conservative while the American one is mixed race and liberal. There is professional competition and hard feelings between the two patriarchs; and when the English professor comes to teach at his competitor's college, the men take opposing stands with regard to academic politics. In the small town environment their families also develop interesting relationships.
The juxtaposition of liberal and conservative attitudes is interesting and I kept watching to see which the author was going to prefer. However, she revealed no bias and showed both liberals and conservatives as a mix of good and bad traits with a touch of hypocrisy and a little infidelity here and there.
Good novel.
The juxtaposition of liberal and conservative attitudes is interesting and I kept watching to see which the author was going to prefer. However, she revealed no bias and showed both liberals and conservatives as a mix of good and bad traits with a touch of hypocrisy and a little infidelity here and there.
Good novel.
Labels:
"On Beauty",
academia,
fiction,
race
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
The Death of the Mythic God by Jim Marion
Jim Marion is the founder and Director of the Institute for Spiritual Awareness in Washington, D.C. and one of the founding members of Ken Wilber’s Institute for Integral Spirituality. He is also a public policy lawyer and his book The Death of the Mythic God; The Rise of Evolutionary Spirituality ties levels of spiritual consciousness to contemporary world politics.
The thesis of this book is that people are evolving in spiritual consciousness both individually and within the human race as a whole. They are moving away from the old concept of God as a being who created everything but who is separate and distinct from his creation. They are moving toward a concept of God as the underlying consciousness (Source, Force, Energy, Whatever) of which the Universe and everything in it is made. It's all God.
Marion, who once studied to become a Catholic priest, has great respect for Christianity and all other religions. However, he believes that Christianity strayed from the teachings of Jesus as the early church grew in size and began to hammer out its formal beliefs. "Jesus taught that we are responsible for our own sins and our own salvation. It is not his responsibility but ours. Jesus did not die to save us from sin. That was a theological interpretation added later by others, and one that directly contradicts what Jesus himself taught." (p. 59)
This is a terrific book -- and short (167 pages). I read it in a couple of evenings.
The thesis of this book is that people are evolving in spiritual consciousness both individually and within the human race as a whole. They are moving away from the old concept of God as a being who created everything but who is separate and distinct from his creation. They are moving toward a concept of God as the underlying consciousness (Source, Force, Energy, Whatever) of which the Universe and everything in it is made. It's all God.
Marion, who once studied to become a Catholic priest, has great respect for Christianity and all other religions. However, he believes that Christianity strayed from the teachings of Jesus as the early church grew in size and began to hammer out its formal beliefs. "Jesus taught that we are responsible for our own sins and our own salvation. It is not his responsibility but ours. Jesus did not die to save us from sin. That was a theological interpretation added later by others, and one that directly contradicts what Jesus himself taught." (p. 59)
This is a terrific book -- and short (167 pages). I read it in a couple of evenings.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
The Hidden Face of God by Gerald Schroeder
In The Hidden Face of God Israeli physicist Gerald Schroeder pulls together quantum mechanics, neuroscience, and Bible study to conclude that mind, as exhibited by the ability to make choices, is inherent in every atom of the Universe.
The book shows the place where physics and metaphysics meet and greet (if not merge). In Schroeder's thesis the basic stuff of the Universe is information: "But when we look below the surface, we discover a world made of a mix of identical particles that are actually waves and then realize that the waves are massless expressions of information. Physics has exposed the metaphysical basis of existence." (p. 173)
Schroeder stops short of saying that the Creator and the Created are one thing, but he does seem to support the basic underlying unity of everything in the Universe -- call it God or a force or what-have-you.
One thing that I didn't like was the author's tendency to gush over how wonderfully complex the human body and brain are. To me this is anthropocentric thinking -- he assumes that human beings are smart enough to assess the complexities of reality. I can't help wondering if the perceived complexity is just a reflection of the limitations of our little animal brains.
The book shows the place where physics and metaphysics meet and greet (if not merge). In Schroeder's thesis the basic stuff of the Universe is information: "But when we look below the surface, we discover a world made of a mix of identical particles that are actually waves and then realize that the waves are massless expressions of information. Physics has exposed the metaphysical basis of existence." (p. 173)
Schroeder stops short of saying that the Creator and the Created are one thing, but he does seem to support the basic underlying unity of everything in the Universe -- call it God or a force or what-have-you.
One thing that I didn't like was the author's tendency to gush over how wonderfully complex the human body and brain are. To me this is anthropocentric thinking -- he assumes that human beings are smart enough to assess the complexities of reality. I can't help wondering if the perceived complexity is just a reflection of the limitations of our little animal brains.
Friday, November 30, 2007
The Trouble with Physics by Lee Smolin
String theory has dominated physics for more than twenty years. There are actually thousands of string theories, but they all have limitations and none has provided the world with the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) that we all anxiously await.
This fact has been troubling a theoretical physicist named Lee Smolin and he has written a very thorough and readable book about it called The Trouble with Physics. (Houghton Mifflin, 2007.) His conclusion: "There needs to be an honest evaluation of the wisdom of sticking to a research program that has failed after decades to find grounding in either experimental results or precise mathematical formulation."
In 1968 a young Italian physicist named Gabriele Veneziano came up with a formula describing the probabilities for two particles to scatter from each other at different angles. By 1970 some physicists were able to express the data in terms of a physical picture in which particles could be seen not as points but as stringlike things existing only in a single dimension. They stretched when gaining energy; they contracted when giving it off; and they vibrated.
String theory in its various permutations became a hot topic in academic physics from around the mid-1980s, but by the end of the 1990s it had been suggested that all the conjectured and constructed string theories might be unified in a deeper (and mysterious) theory called M-theory.
According to Lee Smolin, the trouble with physics is not only that string theory may be wrong, but that its popularity has squelched innovative thinkers who wanted to take other directions within the field of physics. It became very hard for a physicist who was not interested in string theory to get a job. The academic and research communities simply did not provide jobs or grant money for physicists who disbelieved string theory or who wanted to pursue other avenues of research.
Wading through the actual physics in Smolin's book is a bit of a chore, but his critique of academia is clear and convincing. His overall tone is positive and upbeat in spite of the profuse apologies he keeps making to his colleagues in string theory. He ends with suggestions as to how to move the study of physics forward in ways that are more intellectually diverse than they have been in the era of string theory.
This fact has been troubling a theoretical physicist named Lee Smolin and he has written a very thorough and readable book about it called The Trouble with Physics. (Houghton Mifflin, 2007.) His conclusion: "There needs to be an honest evaluation of the wisdom of sticking to a research program that has failed after decades to find grounding in either experimental results or precise mathematical formulation."
In 1968 a young Italian physicist named Gabriele Veneziano came up with a formula describing the probabilities for two particles to scatter from each other at different angles. By 1970 some physicists were able to express the data in terms of a physical picture in which particles could be seen not as points but as stringlike things existing only in a single dimension. They stretched when gaining energy; they contracted when giving it off; and they vibrated.
String theory in its various permutations became a hot topic in academic physics from around the mid-1980s, but by the end of the 1990s it had been suggested that all the conjectured and constructed string theories might be unified in a deeper (and mysterious) theory called M-theory.
According to Lee Smolin, the trouble with physics is not only that string theory may be wrong, but that its popularity has squelched innovative thinkers who wanted to take other directions within the field of physics. It became very hard for a physicist who was not interested in string theory to get a job. The academic and research communities simply did not provide jobs or grant money for physicists who disbelieved string theory or who wanted to pursue other avenues of research.
Wading through the actual physics in Smolin's book is a bit of a chore, but his critique of academia is clear and convincing. His overall tone is positive and upbeat in spite of the profuse apologies he keeps making to his colleagues in string theory. He ends with suggestions as to how to move the study of physics forward in ways that are more intellectually diverse than they have been in the era of string theory.
Friday, October 26, 2007
Cosmic Consciousness by Richard Maurice Bucke
In 1901 a physician named Richard Maurice Bucke published a book that attempts to analyse and classify the mystical experience of connecting to the divine. He refers to this experience as "Cosmic Consciousness" and uses the term as the title of his book. Known as a classic in the study of human consciousness, the book is in some ways quaintly out-of-date (occasionally pure hogwash.) However, it makes a good effort to capture in words an ineffable experience that is far beyond anything that can be understood or expressed with our limited human capabilities.
Bucke looks at 47 cases of what he calls cosmic consciousness, including those of Buddha, Jesus, St. Paul, Plotinus, Mohammed, Dante, Blake, Balzac, Moses, Socrates, Pascal, Spinoza, Swedenborg, Emerson, Tennyson, and Thoreau. His favorite seems to be Walt Whitman (whom he knew personally) and he makes many references to "Leaves of Grass." There are also examples of unknown people born in his own era and usually identified only by initials. These cases are told in the words of the person who lived through the experience.
Most of us are familiar with the stories of Moses and the burning bush, the descent of the Holy Spirit on Jesus after his Baptism, and St. Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus. In various ways, lesser known people have tapped into divine consciousness and Bucke seeks out the common denominators among them. He concludes that they are people who are serious and of good moral character.
"...there comes to the person an intellectual illumination quite impossible to describe. Like a flash there is presented to his consciousness a clear conception ... of the meaning and drift of the universe.... he sees and knows that the cosmos, which to the [common] mind seems made up of dead matter, is in fact far otherwise -- is in very truth a living presence."
The person sees that all life is eternal, that the universe is alive and works for the good of everyone, that the universe is God and its essence is love, that the happiness of every individual is in the long run absolutely certain. The distinction between good and evil falls away and the newly enlightened person sees that all is good in some cosmic way that is not yet available to simple human understanding.
Bucke goes further by postulating that people who have experienced this consciousness are the forerunners of an evolutionary change in the human race. Like the author of The Celestine Prophecy, he thinks we are evolving spiritually and future generations will be more easily in touch with the nature of the divine.Maurice Bucke
Bucke looks at 47 cases of what he calls cosmic consciousness, including those of Buddha, Jesus, St. Paul, Plotinus, Mohammed, Dante, Blake, Balzac, Moses, Socrates, Pascal, Spinoza, Swedenborg, Emerson, Tennyson, and Thoreau. His favorite seems to be Walt Whitman (whom he knew personally) and he makes many references to "Leaves of Grass." There are also examples of unknown people born in his own era and usually identified only by initials. These cases are told in the words of the person who lived through the experience.
Most of us are familiar with the stories of Moses and the burning bush, the descent of the Holy Spirit on Jesus after his Baptism, and St. Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus. In various ways, lesser known people have tapped into divine consciousness and Bucke seeks out the common denominators among them. He concludes that they are people who are serious and of good moral character.
"...there comes to the person an intellectual illumination quite impossible to describe. Like a flash there is presented to his consciousness a clear conception ... of the meaning and drift of the universe.... he sees and knows that the cosmos, which to the [common] mind seems made up of dead matter, is in fact far otherwise -- is in very truth a living presence."
The person sees that all life is eternal, that the universe is alive and works for the good of everyone, that the universe is God and its essence is love, that the happiness of every individual is in the long run absolutely certain. The distinction between good and evil falls away and the newly enlightened person sees that all is good in some cosmic way that is not yet available to simple human understanding.
Bucke goes further by postulating that people who have experienced this consciousness are the forerunners of an evolutionary change in the human race. Like the author of The Celestine Prophecy, he thinks we are evolving spiritually and future generations will be more easily in touch with the nature of the divine.Maurice Bucke
Labels:
consciousness,
mysticism,
transcendence
Thursday, August 30, 2007
The Field; The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe by Lynne McTaggart
For a while I abandoned serious reading to lull myself with a few escapist novels. Through it all, however, I kept reading a book by Lynne McTaggart called The Field; The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe.
Note the word "Force" which puts one in mind of "May the Force be with you." Even though we've laughed at this "Star Wars" futuristic prayer, I believe it exactly captures the nature of the Universe which in my personal theology is the same thing as God.
McTaggart is an investigative reporter who is careful with her facts and her physics and who assiduously footnotes all assertions. Luckily these footnotes are compiled at the back of the book so that those of us who are trusting can just ignore them.
Quantum mechanics has demonstrated that there is no such thing as a vacuum or nothingness. In subatomic terms even empty space is a hive of activity. Elementary particles pop into and out of existence exchanging energy with each other and providing a vast energy source "sitting there unobtrusively in the background of the empty space around us." It is referred to as the Zero Point Field, and through it we humans and all matter are connected to each other and all parts of the cosmos.
But here's the real news: There is no such thing as matter; there is only energy. As McTaggart puts it, "Everything in your world, anything you hold in your hand, no matter how dense, how heavy, how large, on its most fundamental level boils down to a collection of electric charges interacting with a background sea of electromagnetic and other energetic fields -- a kind of electromagnetic drag force. As they would write later, mass was not equivalent to energy; mass was energy. Or even more fundamentally, there is no mass. There is only charge."
McTaggart goes on to explain what this means in terms of your body -- it's made of light. "If living things boil down to charged particles interacting with a field and sending out and receiving quantum information, where do we end and the rest of the world begin? Where is consciousness -- encased inside our bodies or out there in The Field? Indeed, there is no more 'out there' if we and the rest of the world are so intrinsically interconnected."
But some of the most fascinating stuff is at the end of this very readable book. There are serious scientists who have tried to tap into the energy of the Zero Point Field and put it to use. These scientists are employed at places like Stanford and Princeton and have sometimes had the CIA looking over their shoulders trying to keep up with the Soviets who were exploring the same phenomena.
It is amazing to me that all this has not yet seeped into popular thinking. We cling to our belief that we are separate beings while deep in the bowels of academia scientists are pointing to a whole new understanding of who and what we are.
Note the word "Force" which puts one in mind of "May the Force be with you." Even though we've laughed at this "Star Wars" futuristic prayer, I believe it exactly captures the nature of the Universe which in my personal theology is the same thing as God.
McTaggart is an investigative reporter who is careful with her facts and her physics and who assiduously footnotes all assertions. Luckily these footnotes are compiled at the back of the book so that those of us who are trusting can just ignore them.
Quantum mechanics has demonstrated that there is no such thing as a vacuum or nothingness. In subatomic terms even empty space is a hive of activity. Elementary particles pop into and out of existence exchanging energy with each other and providing a vast energy source "sitting there unobtrusively in the background of the empty space around us." It is referred to as the Zero Point Field, and through it we humans and all matter are connected to each other and all parts of the cosmos.
But here's the real news: There is no such thing as matter; there is only energy. As McTaggart puts it, "Everything in your world, anything you hold in your hand, no matter how dense, how heavy, how large, on its most fundamental level boils down to a collection of electric charges interacting with a background sea of electromagnetic and other energetic fields -- a kind of electromagnetic drag force. As they would write later, mass was not equivalent to energy; mass was energy. Or even more fundamentally, there is no mass. There is only charge."
McTaggart goes on to explain what this means in terms of your body -- it's made of light. "If living things boil down to charged particles interacting with a field and sending out and receiving quantum information, where do we end and the rest of the world begin? Where is consciousness -- encased inside our bodies or out there in The Field? Indeed, there is no more 'out there' if we and the rest of the world are so intrinsically interconnected."
But some of the most fascinating stuff is at the end of this very readable book. There are serious scientists who have tried to tap into the energy of the Zero Point Field and put it to use. These scientists are employed at places like Stanford and Princeton and have sometimes had the CIA looking over their shoulders trying to keep up with the Soviets who were exploring the same phenomena.
It is amazing to me that all this has not yet seeped into popular thinking. We cling to our belief that we are separate beings while deep in the bowels of academia scientists are pointing to a whole new understanding of who and what we are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)